Insurance company poised to drop Canyon County’s coverage | Health

NAMPA, Idaho (AP) — An coverage organization that handles counties and other public entities in Idaho suggests it will not renew Canyon County’s coverage coverage because of rising hazards and a higher volume of claims.

The Idaho Counties Threat Management Application, recognized as ICRMP, sent a letter to Canyon County officials on Could 23, citing “numerous factors such as adverse declare advancement and expanding threat exposures,” the Idaho Press reported. The Nampa-based mostly newspaper attained the document by way of community records requests.

Canyon County Community Facts Officer Joe Decker reported the county’s elected officers could not straight away comment mainly because the situation is onging.

“We are performing to appraise all alternatives, such as likely renewal with ICRMP and the potential acquisition of substitution protection,” Decker wrote in an email. “More information and facts will be forthcoming when accessible.”

Canyon County Commissioners responded to ICRMP in a June 2 letter that advised the county may possibly attraction the non-renewal notice. They took situation with the non-renewal final decision, stating, “the abruptness and comprehensiveness of this total separation, and the deficiency of warning or chance to treatment any perceived issue, is shocking.”

The commissioners also reported the insurance policy company’s documentation demonstrating the county’s “loss history” was not exact. They reported 25 of the claims outlined are “unrelated to the county.”

They also reported the insurance policy organization was equating so-referred to as “nuisance settlements” — typically created when an entity decides that having to pay someone to end a lawsuit would be much less expensive or much more effortless than fighting the make any difference in court docket — with real misconduct by the county or its reps.

Tim Osborne, govt director of ICRMP, said in a telephone job interview that he could not elaborate on the causes that the board voted to non-renew the plan. He said his office is doing the job to coordinate a meeting with Canyon County officers to critique the “documentation” of the motives the board voted to non-renew. Following that meeting, Canyon County officers could ask for a conference with the board in open up session about how to go ahead, he explained.